The aim of this research is to establish an independent evidence base for identifying the value and the limits of mediation as an alternative to , or used alongside , judicial review.
Given its place in the UK’s constitutional system , an empirically based understanding of the way the judicial review procedure operates is of the utmost importance to users of the system and policymakers. This project offers the first analysis of the process since the post-Bowman reforms were introduced in October 2003 and does so at a time when potentially major changes are taking place to the system in the form of regionalisation and the anticipated transfer of certain cases from the Administrative Court to the Upper Tier Tribunals.
This is a practical guide to third party interventions.
This is the Public Law Project’s response to the Legal Services Commission’s ‘Legal Aid: a sustainable future’ consultation.
This is the Public Law Project’s submission on ‘The role of legal NGOs within the new Community Legal Service’.
This is the Public Law Project’s response to the Legal Services Commission’s ‘Preferred supplier scheme’ consultation.
A short guide to how public law can assist individuals.
A short guide on public funding for Judicial Review.
A short guide to funding Judicial Reviews without public funding.
A short guide to complaints to the Ombudsman.
A short guide to Judicial Review remedies.
A short guide to Judicial Review procedure.