Latest news

News & Updates

Unfair, unworkable and unsafe: Government’s new asylum Bill

Yesterday the Government published its new long-awaited Immigration and Asylum Bill – the Government’s second round of immigration legislation, following the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025.   Regrettably, the Government’s new Bill is likely to make the UK’s asylum system more unfair, unworkable and unsafe. The proposals appear to be driven by short-term

1 Jul 2026

Research

Cultural, linguistic and procedural barriers to access to justice in immigration and asylum tribunals

Snapshot: Language and cultural barriers are undermining access to justice in immigration and asylum tribunals. Interpretation errors and misunderstandings do affect evidence, credibility and case outcomes. Applicants without legal representation face the greatest disadvantage in navigating a complex system. PLP is calling for stronger interpretation services, cultural awareness and procedural support to make justice genuinely

30 Jun 2026

News & Updates

National Lottery funding supports PLP’s work to tackle inequality

Thanks to National Lottery players, Public Law Project has received more than £3.5 million of truly life-changing funding over five years to advance strategic legal challenges, research co-produced with communities, and communications that shifts thinking and policy. At the heart of this work is a new Community Knowledge Exchange, where community partners, lawyers, researchers and decision makers work together to share knowledge and shape

11 Jun 2026

Policy briefings and submissions

Call for evidence: Independent Appeals Body (IAB)

The Government has proposed creating a new Independent Appeals Body (IAB) to hear asylum appeals, as part of wider reforms to speed up decision-making and reduce backlogs in the system. In May 2026, the Public Law Project (PLP) submitted evidence in response, raising serious concerns about the independence of the new body and the assumptions behind them. Read the

28 May 2026

Research

Price tag: How costs rules in judicial review undermine the rule of law and access to justice

Snapshot: Judicial review — a legal process that holds public bodies to account — is financially out of reach for most ordinary people 97% of legal practitioners surveyed said costs rules are an obstacle to the rule of law and access to justice People earning above just £32,000, the threshold for legal aid, frequently do not pursue or abandon legal claims

Please note: Public law is a very fast moving area and some of the information will be out of date or overtaken by events. PLP accept no responsibility for the contents of these items.