Research

Research Strategy 2020

Dr Joe Tomlinson

This document sets out an initial research strategy for PLP, to operate from 2018 to 2020. The context of this strategy is PLP’s overarching strategic plan, and the organisation’s agreed priorities and goals for the period. In addition, a key aim this initial period is to confirm the PLP’s identity as a producer of high-quality,

5 Apr 2018

Research

Exceptional Case Funding Clinics

Emma Marshall

The research presented here focuses on the feasibility of developing access to legal aid through the Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme, by setting up and running ECF projects in university law schools. This report contributes to PLP’s existing research undertaken in partnership with university law clinics,1 which seeks to develop knowledge and understanding about the

5 Apr 2018

Research

The Digitalisation of Tribunals: What we know and what we need to know

Professor Robert Thomas and Dr Joe Tomlinson

Tribunals are a major part of the administrative justice system. The Government has begun to introduce digital procedures in tribunals but the full details of the changes remain to be seen. This report—commissioned by the UK Administrative Justice Institute—outlines ‘what we know and what we need to know’ about the digitalisation of tribunals. It takes

5 Apr 2018

Research

Public Law and Clinical Legal Environments

Public Law Project

University law clinics are a developing tool for both legal skills-based education and academic education. As well as providing students with experience of law in action and a practical base for academic enquiry, law clinics are, and should be supported as, an important means of providing practical legal work experience; especially where they can provide

5 Apr 2018

Research

Lions under the Throne

Sir Stephen Sedley

Sir Stephen Sedley and Cambridge University Press (CUP) have allowed us to publish the introduction to Lions under the Throne , Essays on the History of English Public Law. The first part of this chapter sketches the early growth of English public law. The second part tries to describe what it was like to be involved in the modern take-off of public law as it roused itself from its long sleep.

2 Dec 2015

Research

The Value and Effects of Judicial Review

Dr Varda Bondy, Professor Lucinda Platt and Professor Maurice Sunkin

The process through which legal redress may be obtained against public authorities is often criticised as being politicised , of little value to claimants , and burdensome on public bodies. Based on the largest empirical study of judicial review outcomes to date , Varda Bondy , Lucinda Platt and Maurice Sunkin explain how the process can actually benefit claimants , and improve policy and practice.

15 Oct 2015

Research

Judicial Review and Mediation

Dr Varda Bondy and Helen Curtis

This is the powerpoint (PDF) which accompanied a presentation on judicial review and mediation. The presentation covered:

– when to mediate , pre or post permission?

– what added value can mediation offer to complement litigation?

– how to propose mediation persuasively or deal with a refusal to mediate

10 Jul 2015

Research

Keys to the Gateway: An Independent Review of the Mandatory Civil Legal Advice Gateway

Ben Hickman and David Oldfield

This research paper considers the extent to which the Ministry of Justice review of the Mandatory Civil Legal Advice Telephone Gateway engages with the key legislative and policy intentions behind it , as well as the extent to which the Gateway , as implemented , meets those intentions.

2 Mar 2015

Research

Designing redress: a study about grievances against public bodies

Varda Bondy and Professor Andrew Le Sueur

Public bodies have in recent years been exhorted to get decisions ‘right first time’. The concept of administrative justice is seen by some scholars as including initial decisions as well as what happens when administrative decisions are challenged. Notwithstanding these developments , the redress of grievances remains central to the concerns of administrative law scholars , and public bodies expend a great deal of time and money handling grievances. It is just about possible to imagine an idealised administrative system in which no errors are ever made by decision-makers and all past , present and future decisions are accepted as correct and legitimate by citizens and business enterprises. In reality , this can never be achieved (except perhaps in well-resourced administrative schemes of limited size and relative simplicity).

31 Jul 2012

Research

Mediation in Judicial Review: a practitioners’ handbook

Varda Bondy and Margaret Doyle

What place does mediation have in judicial review cases? Research by the Public Law Project (PLP) and the University of Essex on the permission stage in judicial review concluded that most judicial review claims are settled and that most settlements satisfy the claims made in the judicial review. While some cases that settle as a result of bilateral negotiations could arguably result in a better outcome for one or both parties were they mediated instead , mediation is an unlikely option where more familiar and straightforward routes to disposal are available to lawyers.

31 Jan 2011

Research

Mediation and Judicial Review

Varda Bondy and Professor Linda Mulcahy with Margaret Doyle and Val Reid

The aim of this research is to establish an independent evidence base for identifying the value and the limits of mediation as an alternative to , or used alongside , judicial review.

13 Jun 2009

Research

The Dynamics of Judicial Review Litigation

Varda Bondy and Professor Maurice Sunkin

Given its place in the UK’s constitutional system , an empirically based understanding of the way the judicial review procedure operates is of the utmost importance to users of the system and policymakers. This project offers the first analysis of the process since the post-Bowman reforms were introduced in October 2003 and does so at a time when potentially major changes are taking place to the system in the form of regionalisation and the anticipated transfer of certain cases from the Administrative Court to the Upper Tier Tribunals.

3 Jun 2009